Ambulatory Pediatrics
Volume 8, Issue 5 , Pages 321-328, September 2008

The Impact of Insurance Instability on Children's Access, Utilization, and Satisfaction with Health Care

  • Amy Cassedy, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Amy Cassedy, PhD, Research Associate, Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039.
  • ,
  • Gerry Fairbrother, PhD
  • ,
  • Paul W. Newacheck, DrPH

From the Center for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Cassedy and Dr Fairbrother); and Institute for Health Policy Studies, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, Calif (Dr Newacheck)

Received 26 March 2007; accepted 4 April 2008. published online 16 June 2008.

Objectives

We describe instability of health insurance coverage for children aged 2 to 17 years and relate insurance instability to access, utilization and satisfaction.

Methods

Three 2-year panels of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were used to measure insurance instability and its relationship to access, utilization, and problems with medical care.

Results

Over a 2-year period, 53% of children were continuously insured with private coverage, 19% had continuous public insurance, 20% had a single gap in coverage, 2% had multiple gaps, and 6% were continuously uninsured. Compared with children continuously insured through private coverage, children with single or multiple gaps or who were continuously uninsured were significantly more likely to lack a usual source of care (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] = 2.3, 3.5, and 4.5, respectively), to have no well-child visits (AORs = 1.2, 2.2 and 2.4, respectively), and to have unmet medical or prescription drug needs (AORs = 4.5, 4.2 and 3.4, respectively). There were no significant differences between children continuously insured through private coverage and children with single or multiple gaps or continuously uninsured and having at least 1 problem with medical care (AORs = 0.8, 1.3, and 1.4, respectively). While there were no differences between children continuously insured through private coverage and children with multiple gaps or continuously uninsured, children with single gap in coverage were significantly more likely to report having at least one problem with medical care (AOR = 1.5).

Conclusions

Compared with those with continuous coverage, children with gaps in coverage—especially those with multiple gaps—are less likely to have a usual source of care and receive well-child care. The national debate should incorporate discussions of policies to promote not only expansions of coverage, but also initiatives to eliminate gaps in coverage.

Key Words: access, children, gaps in insurance coverage, health care utilization, insurance, satisfaction, unmet medical needs

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1530-1567(08)00117-2

doi:10.1016/j.ambp.2008.04.007

Ambulatory Pediatrics
Volume 8, Issue 5 , Pages 321-328, September 2008