Unanswered Questions Prompted During Pediatric Primary Care Visits
Objectives
To identify the frequency, types, and perceived importance of questions prompted during primary care visits for which pediatricians have no ready answer; to characterize pediatricians' responses to them; and to determine how questions prompted while caring for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and children without special needs (Cw/oSN) differ.
Methods
Patient visits with 35 general pediatricians were observed. Parents completed a CSHCN screener. Physicians provided details about their unanswered questions and their pursuit of answers.
Results
Of 890 observed visits, 170 (19.1%) prompted unanswered questions, of which 60.1% were deemed important or very important. Physicians intended to pursue answers to 49.7% of the questions but actually pursued answers for only 27.5%, citing lack of time and inadequate information resources as barriers. One hundred sixty-seven (18.8%) visits were with CSHCN. Unanswered questions arose more often with CSHCN than with Cw/oSN (28.7% vs 16.9%; odds ratio 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.32–2.97), particularly during well visits (34.6% vs 14.9%; odds ratio 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.59–6.39). CSHCN prompted more diagnosis and treatment questions than Cw/oSN. Questions prompted by CSHCN were ranked as more important but were no more likely to be pursued than those prompted by Cw/oSN.
Conclusions
Unanswered questions arise during nearly 20% of pediatric primary care visits. Visits with CSHCN, particularly well visits, generate more questions than those with Cw/oSN. Answers are pursued for few unanswered questions, both overall and for CSHCN. Potential strategies to overcome barriers to answering questions include scheduling more time or more visits for CSHCN.
Key Words: children with special health care needs, knowledge resources, medical home, primary care
To access this article, please choose from the options below
Presented in part at the Ambulatory Pediatric Association Western Region Meeting, Salt Lake City, Utah, January 29, 2005; and at the Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting, Washington, DC, May 15, 2005.
PII: S1530-1567(07)00095-0
doi:10.1016/j.ambp.2007.05.008
© 2007 Ambulatory Pediatric Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
