Ambulatory Pediatrics
Volume 5, Issue 5 , Pages 302-305, September 2005

Evidence-Based Medicine in Pediatric Residency Programs: Where Are We Now?

  • Hans B. Kersten, Dr, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Pediatrics (Dr Kersten), Drexel University College of Medicine, Section of General Pediatrics, St Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to Hans B. Kersten, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine, Division of Ambulatory Pediatrics, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Front Street at Erie Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19134
  • ,
  • Tara M. Randis, MD

      Affiliations

    • From the Department of Pediatrics (Dr Kersten), Drexel University College of Medicine, Section of General Pediatrics, St Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Angelo P. Giardino, Dr, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine (Dr Randis), Children's Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY; and Baylor College of Medicine (Dr Giardino), Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Tex

Received 21 October 2004; accepted 24 June 2005.

Background.—Evidence-based medicine (EBM) integrates the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values to optimize clinical outcomes for our patients.

Objective.—To examine incorporation of EBM into journal club (JC) and other venues within pediatric residency programs.

Design/Methods.—A 30-question confidential survey was designed to determine how residents are taught and practice EBM. The survey was sent to the chief resident (CR) at all North American pediatric residency programs (N = 192). Nonrespondents were sent surveys 4 and 8 weeks later.

Results.—The response rate was 80% (n = 153). Pediatric residency programs varied in size from 12 to 132 residents from responses in 39 states. Most programs (97%, confidence interval [CI], 92–99) used EBM. JC (89%, CI, 83–93), noontime lectures (62%, CI, 54–70), and morning report (61%, CI, 53–69) were the most common venues used to teach EBM. JC (58%, CI, 50–66), morning report (11%, CI, 6–17), and resident workshop (11%, CI, 6–17) were the most effective venues to teach EBM, although resident workshops were as effective as JC to teach EBM in programs offering workshops (38% each, CI, 21–56). Most CRs felt confident in their ability to practice EBM (56%, CI, 48–64), but few CRs felt that their program could teach EBM (7%) or evaluate EBM effectiveness (20%).

Conclusions.—EBM is common throughout pediatric residencies. JC was the most effective venue in which to teach EBM, unless a workshop was offered. Most CRs thought it was important to teach EBM, but did not feel confident in their program's ability to teach EBM.

KEY WORDS:  education , evidence-based , pediatrics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1530-1567(05)60367-X

doi:10.1367/A04-182R1.1

Ambulatory Pediatrics
Volume 5, Issue 5 , Pages 302-305, September 2005